| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Social Politics, Volume 11, Number 3, © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.
Losing Ground: Gendered Knowledges, Parole Risk, and Responsibility
University of Toronto
The recent emphasis in the scholarly literature and in social policy arena on gender-responsive interventions raises theoretical and applied questions about how gender responsiveness is interpreted in penal policy and by local decision makers. This article examines how gender-neutral developments in welfare and penal policy intersect with and shape gender-responsive strategies. Using data extracted from 144 federal female parole candidates' case files and the National Parole Board's decision registry, it shows how members of Canada's National Parole Board, operating in a broader culture of gender-responsive policy and cultural sensitivity, construct and use gendered knowledges of risk to interpret women offenders' experiences when making release decisions. The article analyzes the gendered nature of interpretations of four types of risk informationcriminal history, victimization, mental health, and responsibilitythat dominate practitioners' parole decision narratives. It shows how these gendered knowledges of risk reframe victimization and mental health difficulties and transform them into issues of choice and responsibility.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Turnbull and K. Hannah-Moffat Under These Conditions: Gender, Parole and the Governance of Reintegration Br. J. Criminol., July 1, 2009; 49(4): 532 - 551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Brown and B. Bloom Reentry and Renegotiating Motherhood: Maternal Identity and Success on Parole Crime Delinquency, April 1, 2009; 55(2): 313 - 336. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. McKim "Getting Gut-Level": Punishment, Gender, and Therapeutic Governance Gender Society, June 1, 2008; 22(3): 303 - 323. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Holtfreter and R. Cupp Gender and Risk Assessment: The Empirical Status of the LSI-R for Women Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, November 1, 2007; 23(4): 363 - 382. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Murphy and N. Whitty Risk and Human Rights in UK Prison Governance Br. J. Criminol., September 1, 2007; 47(5): 798 - 816. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Pollack "I'm Just Not Good in Relationships": Victimization Discourses and the Gendered Regulation of Criminalized Women Feminist Criminology, April 1, 2007; 2(2): 158 - 174. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bosworth Creating the responsible prisoner: Federal admission and orientation packs Punishment Society, January 1, 2007; 9(1): 67 - 85. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. K. Cheliotis Demystifying risk management: A process evaluation of the prisoners' home leave scheme in Greece JCriminology and Criminal Justice, May 1, 2006; 6(2): 163 - 195. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Batchelor 'Prove me the bam!': Victimization and agency in the lives of young women who commit violent offences Probation Journal, December 1, 2005; 52(4): 358 - 375. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||







