Skip Navigation

Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 2004 11(3):386-410; doi:10.1093/sp/jxh042
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McCorkel, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Social Politics, Volume 11, Number 3, © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved.

Criminally Dependent? Gender, Punishment, and the Rhetoric of Welfare Reform

Jill McCorkel

University of Massachusetts, Amherst

Over the past twenty-five years, parallel increases in the severity of U.S. criminal justice and welfare policies have had devastating consequences for poor women and their families. Feminist criminologists argue that sharp restrictions in welfare provisions and dramatic increases in the number of women sentenced to prison do not constitute a war on drugs, crime, and poverty so much as a war on women. Other observers suggest that these trends are indicative of a larger policy regime that organizes penal-welfare responses for the purpose of governing social marginality. Embedded in both accounts are assumptions about coordination within and across state systems, as well as how larger policy mandates are implemented at the local level. The present study relies on ethnographic data collected from a state prison for women to examine whether and to what extent welfare and criminal justice policies were coordinated during the drug and poverty wars of the past decade. Findings reveal that drug war policies did indeed transform punishment practices on the feminine side of the penal system, but such transformations were ultimately premised on changes to institutional interpretive structures that altered the ways state actors conceptualized gender, crime, and women's needs. Central to this interpretive reconfiguration were institutionalized links between the welfare and criminal justice systems and state actors strategic appropriation of dependency discourse associated with welfare reform.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Feminist CriminologyHome page
S. Cherukuri, D. M. Britton, and M. Subramaniam
Between Life and Death: Women in an Indian State Prison
Feminist Criminology, July 1, 2009; 4(3): 252 - 274.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J CriminolHome page
S. Turnbull and K. Hannah-Moffat
Under These Conditions: Gender, Parole and the Governance of Reintegration
Br. J. Criminol., July 1, 2009; 49(4): 532 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Gender SocietyHome page
A. McKim
"Getting Gut-Level": Punishment, Gender, and Therapeutic Governance
Gender Society, June 1, 2008; 22(3): 303 - 323.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Br J Soc WorkHome page
S. Pollack
Labelling Clients 'Risky': Social Work and the Neo-liberal Welfare State
Br. J. Soc. Work, May 30, 2008; (2008) bcn079v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.