Skip Navigation

Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 2005 12(2):264-288; doi:10.1093/sp/jxi014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by England, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org.

Gender Inequality in Labor Markets: The Role of Motherhood and Segregation

Paula England

Stanford University

This article provides an overview of gender inequality in labor markets in the United States. I show trends in labor force participation, occupational segregation, and the pay gap. Though my main focus is the United States, I note where similar findings exist for other affluent nations. I explain what we know from past research about the causes of inequality and note the gaps in our knowledge. In broad brush strokes, the sex gap in pay in the United States has two major sources: the segregation of jobs and the effects of women’s responsibility for childrearing. My major thesis is that at least in the United States, these two are largely unrelated. That is, the causes of segregation do not seem to be largely about women’s mothering responsibilities, and the penalties for motherhood do not appear to flow largely through segregation. This thesis is at odds with much thinking among economists, who have seen segregation as a rational response by employers and employees to gender differences in intermittence of employment. In this economic view, women choose more "mother-friendly" jobs, which maximize their earnings conditional on intermittent and flexible employment but tradeoff on-the-job training, higher earnings, and steeper wage trajectories to do so.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Eur Sociol RevHome page
J. Tomlinson, W. Olsen, and K. Purdam
Women Returners and Potential Returners: Employment Profiles and Labour Market Opportunities--A Case Study of the United Kingdom
Eur. Sociol. Rev., June 1, 2009; 25(3): 349 - 363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 SOC POLHome page
C. Bolzendahl
Making the Implicit Explicit: Gender Influences on Social Spending in Twelve Industrialized Democracies, 1980-99
Soc. Pol., March 1, 2009; 16(1): 40 - 81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Gender SocietyHome page
J. Mcquillan, A. L. Greil, K. M. Shreffler, and V. Tichenor
The Importance of Motherhood Among Women in the Contemporary United States
Gender Society, August 1, 2008; 22(4): 477 - 496.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 AJPHHome page
S. C. Maty, J. W. Lynch, T. E. Raghunathan, and G. A. Kaplan
Childhood Socioeconomic Position, Gender, Adult Body Mass Index, and Incidence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Over 34 Years in the Alameda County Study
Am J Public Health, August 1, 2008; 98(8): 1486 - 1494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.