Skip Navigation


Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society Advance Access originally published online on November 8, 2005
Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 2005 12(3):389-411; doi:10.1093/sp/jxi021
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
12/3/389    most recent
jxi021v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Perrons, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Gender Mainstreaming and Gender Equality in the New (Market) Economy: An Analysis of Contradictions

Diane Perrons

Gender mainstreaming now forms part of many national and supranational policies and is mandatory in development projects such as those financed by the EU structural funds and by the World Bank. Yet gender equality remains elusive. Recent studies have highlighted institutional barriers or resistances to gender mainstreaming. This article takes a rather different approach by developing a conceptualization of the new economy that highlights the market tendency toward widening gender and class inequalities. The implication of the analysis is that effective gender mainstreaming would require a broader and more holistic conceptualization of the economy in order to secure greater gender equality. The theoretical argument has relevance to countries seeking to develop knowledge-based economies. The policy discussion relates to the European Union, and the specific empirical illustration to London. This multi-scalar approach reflects the way that different policy frameworks and local situatedness mediate the global neo-liberal trajectory in different ways. If the current efforts to transform the European social model by more neo-liberal economic policies succeed, these UK findings may reflect the shape of things to come in Europe and perhaps elsewhere.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.