Skip Navigation


Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society Advance Access originally published online on February 21, 2006
Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 2006 13(1):30-58; doi:10.1093/sp/jxj002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
13/1/30    most recent
jxj002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lépinard, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Identity without Politics: Framing the Parity Laws and Their Implementation in French Local Politics

Eléonore Lépinard

Eléonore Lépinard is a postdoctoral fellow at the Chaire de recherche du Canada en Citoyenneté et Gouvernance at the Université de Montréal (Canada).

Correspondence: To whom correspondence should be addressed; Département de science politique, Université de Montréal, CP 6128, succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal QC H3C 3J7, Canada; Email: Eleonore.lepinard{at}umontreal.ca.

This article provides an alternative approach to the arguments of "critical mass," whose tenets assume that policies fostering women’s rights would arise from an increase in women’s political representation. Instead, the article argues that the cultural repertoires that are used to justify women’s higher numerical presence also matter. Indeed, different repertoires—such as claiming women’s inclusion into politics in the name of women’s interests or in the name of their difference—have different political outcomes. This case study of the French sex-parity laws, which ensures a 50-percent quota of women in politics, explores the connection between the rationales to legitimize the laws and their implementation at the local level. This provides for, first, an investigation of how the requirement to make the parity claim compatible with French cultural repertoires on citizenship and sovereignty has led parity advocates to define sexual difference as universal. Then, drawing on interviews with local politicians, it shows how this rationale underlining sexual difference has failed to define gender relationships as political and, thus, to promote gender equality in local public policies.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 SOC POLHome page
M. L. Krook
Quota Laws for Women in Politics: Implications for Feminist Practice
Soc. Pol., September 1, 2008; 15(3): 345 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.