Skip Navigation


Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society Advance Access originally published online on May 9, 2006
Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 2006 13(2):286-312; doi:10.1093/sp/jxj011
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
13/2/286    most recent
jxj011v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wincott, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Paradoxes of New Labour Social Policy: Toward Universal Child Care in Europe’s "Most Liberal" Welfare Regime?

Daniel Wincott

This article interrogates recent developments in early childhood education and care policy in Britain, taking care to include the experiences in Wales and Scotland alongside those in England. It focuses on the apparently paradoxical aspiration to "universal childcare" in the state usually identified as the most liberal (residualist) in Europe. It finds evidence of greater policy innovation in Wales than in Scotland, despite the weaker formal powers and flimsier child care policy legacy in the former. England displays a second paradox: policy expansion (from a very low base) against an apparently unfavorable background despite a lack of strategic policy coherence. On the basis of this record, the article goes on to a reappraisal of welfare regime theory. It argues that we should expect a degree of incoherence and inconsistency in social policies. As a result, regimes are better understood as abstract concepts than as precise descriptions of particular welfare states, which are better understood as welfare settlements.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.