Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society Advance Access originally published online on August 10, 2006
Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 2006 13(3):341-371; doi:10.1093/sp/jxl004
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Carefair : Choice, Duty, and the Distribution of Care
Mens care patterns are relatively inelastic despite dramatic shifts in womens labor force participation. The article recommends a caregiving analogue to workfare that would use policy more aggressively to influence mens choices between employment and care. The "carefair" concept is defended by invoking two arguments for enforcing work duties common in liberal regimes: the moral hazard argument and the new paternalist competence argument. The logics explicit in these arguments resonate substantially with theorists and practitioners in the liberal cultural milieu and can be appropriated to justify state intervention that would challenge both patriarchal socialization patterns and economic incentives.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Kershaw, J. Pulkingham, and S. Fuller Expanding the Subject: Violence, Care, and (In)Active Male Citizenship Soc. Pol., June 1, 2008; 15(2): 182 - 206. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
