Skip Navigation


Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society Advance Access originally published online on June 7, 2007
Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 2007 14(2):155-181; doi:10.1093/sp/jxm009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
14/2/155    most recent
jxm009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harder, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Rights of Love: the State and Intimate Relationships in Canada and the United States

Lois Harder

Lois Harder is an associate professor of political science at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada

Correspondence: She can be contacted at the Department of Political Science, University of Alberta, 10-16 HM Tory Building, Edmonton, Canada T6G 2H4. Tel.: +780 492 0535; fax: +780 492 2586; E-mail: lharder{at}ualberta.ca

This article puzzles through the contrasts and paradoxes arising from state practices of relationship recognition in Canada and the United States. In the Canadian case, the focus is on the assignment of legal status to common-law relationships, regardless of whether the parties to the relationship desire that status. In the United States, in contrast, legislative attention has been directed at the reinforcement of heterosexual marriage. These differing postures provoke questions regarding the roles of intimate relationships in governing projects. In particular, what do these postures mean for the autonomy of individuals to construct their personal lives and how do they complicate the designation "neoliberal" to Canadian and US regimes of governance.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.