Skip Navigation


Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society Advance Access originally published online on November 16, 2008
Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 2008 15(4):411-432; doi:10.1093/sp/jxn019
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
15/4/411    most recent
jxn019v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gresch, N.
Right arrow Articles by Sauer, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society issue: Special Issue: The Veil: Debating Citizenship, Gender and Religious Diversity [View the issue table of contents]

Tu felix Austria? The Headscarf and the Politics of ‘Non-issues’1

Nora Gresch, Leila Hadj-Abdou, Sieglinde Rosenberger and Birgit Sauer

Correspondence: E-mail: leila.hadj-abdou{at}univie.ac.at

Austria has one of the most tolerant regulations concerning the expression of religious beliefs and practices in the public realm in Europe. Concerning the headscarf, the Austrian legislation does not know any restrictions on wearing headgear—neither for cultural nor for security reasons – if wearing a veil is clearly related to religious reasons. These liberal legal regulations have even been strengthened during the recent years. In line with this legal framework, public disputes over religious attire worn in public institutions have remained rather modest in Austria compared with other Western liberal democracies. However, the tolerant legal regulations are contrasted with rather palpable racist attitudes within the Austrian population, the recent adoption of restrictive immigration and integration policies and right-wing parties that systematically foster sentiments against immigrants. This paper explores these diverging policy-strategies by focusing on structures and institutions that account for Austria's tolerant approach towards veiling and argues that it is the legacy of Austria's "pluralistically inclusive" state-church relation, which provides special institutional structures and procedures to deal with religious issues as well as the dominant framing that constitute the tolerant context for Muslim practices. By focusing on the current headscarf debates, the paper indicates that this silent compromise is getting fragile due to the re-framing strategies of right-wing parties in the context of an ethno-cultural citizenship regime that describes Muslims in Austria as cultural or ethnic and not as religious others.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.