Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BURTON, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, Volume 5, Number 3, pp. 338-361
© 1998 Oxford University Press


research-article

States of Injury: Josephine Butler on Slavery, Citizenship, and the Boer War

ANTOINETTE BURTON

In her recent collection of essays, States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity (1995), Wendy Brown argues that western liberal political constituencies, feminists among them, have tradition ally protested against exclusion from the universal category of "citizen" by insisting on their "wounded attachments" to the nationstate as the basis for civic participation. This essay attempts to lend historical depth to her provocative contention by analyzing a discrete example of Victorian feminist production, Josephine Butler's Native Races and the War (1900). In her tract, which was a defense of British military aggression in South Africa as well as of its imperial interests there, Butler mobilizes the discourse of antislavery to justify Britain's involvement in the war as well as to foreground the "pathetic" plight of African men under Afrikaner rule. In a series of rhetorical maneuvers that echo and refigure British feminists' attachments to the sentimentalized discourses of antislavery, Butler uses the "states of injury" suffered by black South Africans to make an argument for the necessity not just of British imperial rule, but British women's suffrage as well.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.