Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christopher, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 9:60-86 (2002)
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Welfare state regimes and mothers' poverty

K Christopher

This article assesses the extent to which welfare states reduce poverty among single mothers and all mothers. I focus on two different typologies of welfare states: one identifies the gendered assumptions underlying social policies, while the other focuses on how welfare states and labor markets affect class inequality. Using data from the Luxembourg Income Study, I show how tax and transfer systems and employment supports in nine Western nations affect the poverty rates of single mothers and all mothers via-à-vis other groups. I find that, particularly in the Scandinavian nations and to a lesser extent in France, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom, the tax and transfer system, employment supports, or a combination of the two allow most single mothers to form autonomous household that escape poverty. I conclude by discussing how these findings speak to the different typologies of welfare state regimes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Gender SocietyHome page
J. Misra, S. Moller, and M. J. Budig
Work Family Policies and Poverty for Partnered and Single Women in Europe and North America
Gender Society, December 1, 2007; 21(6): 804 - 827.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.