Skip Navigation



Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society Advance Access published online on April 5, 2007
Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, doi:10.1093/sp/jxm003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
14/1/31    most recent
jxm003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brennan, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Babies, Budgets, and Birthrates: Work/Family Policy in Australia 1996–2006

Deborah Brennan

Correspondence: deborahjanebrennan{at}mac.com

Work/family reconciliation policies can be harnessed to diverse political agendas, ranging from feminist-inspired equality strategies to coercive, neo-liberal programs. In Australia, such policies have served a range of ends under different governments. This article focuses on developments since 1996 when the conservative coalition parties led by John Howard were elected to government. It explores three policy domains that are central to Australia's work/family agenda: family payments, maternity/parental leave, and child care. Changes in these areas are situated in the context of the government's broader strategies concerning labor market flexibility, tax reform, and declining fertility. The article argues that there has been a substantial retreat from the "femocrat" strategies adopted under Labor in the 1980s and early 1990s. The general thrust of the Howard government has been to discourage labor force participation of mothers of young children, with the important exception of sole parents. In a number of areas policies are inconsistent, reflecting the government's ambivalence about whether to support women as home-based carers, wage earners, or both.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 SOC POLHome page
E. Huber, J. D. Stephens, D. Bradley, S. Moller, and F. Nielsen
The Politics of Women's Economic Independence
Soc. Pol., March 1, 2009; 16(1): 1 - 39.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 SOC POLHome page
M. Andrew
Questioning Women's Movement 'Strategies': Australian Activism on Work and Care
Soc. Pol., September 1, 2008; 15(3): 369 - 395.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 SOC POLHome page
A. Henninger, C. Wimbauer, and R. Dombrowski
Demography as a Push toward Gender Equality? Current Reforms of German Family Policy
Soc. Pol., September 1, 2008; 15(3): 287 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.